MAKING MEANING THROUGH TEACHER TALK: LEXICAL RELATIONS IN VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION IN AN ESP SPEAKING CLASSROOM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70210/amrj.v4i2.214Keywords:
lexical relations, vocabulary instruction, teacher talk, english for specific purposesAbstract
Vocabulary mastery remains one of the most persistent challenges for EFL learners, particularly when closely related words carry different meanings across registers, a problem that intensifies in register-dense professional genres. This qualitative study aims to identify the types of lexical relations used by an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) speaking teacher while clarifying vocabulary for her students, and to describe the discourse strategies accompanying those clarifications. A case study design was employed, with the ESP teacher and her speaking class of undergraduate Law students preparing curriculum vitae (CV) and job-interview materials as the research subject. Data were collected through a 100-minute non-participant classroom observation, video recording, and a semi-structured interview, then analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis. Consistent with this aim, the results show that the teacher's talk fully realized seven of the eight categories of lexical relations proposed by Yule (2020), namely synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy, prototype effects, polysemy, metonymy, and collocation, while the eighth category, homophones and homonyms, was only partially represented through two instances of homonymy, with no instances of homophones identified in the data. These relations were embedded within a recurring routine of elicitation, code-switching, contrastive restatement, and exemplification. These findings imply that a single, register-dense ESP topic can be strategically leveraged to teach a wide range of lexical relations. It is concluded that explicit, context-sensitive vocabulary clarification supports learners' precision of meaning in specialized professional communication.
Downloads
References
Al Zahrani, S. M., & Chaudhary, A. (2022). Vocabulary learning strategies in ESP context. Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.25
Albelihi, H. H. M. (2022). Lexical and cohesive links in EFL learners' writing: Exploring the use of task-based language teaching. Frontiers in Education, 7, 996171. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.996171
Alshumrani, H. A. (2024). Unveiling vocabulary teaching and learning beliefs of teachers and learners in an EFL context. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00242-0
Bao, Z., & Peng, C. (2024). The effects of EFL wordlist and proficiency on vocabulary knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1289106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1289106
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Jashari, A. (2024). The importance of teaching paradigmatic lexical relations to EFL students: How to teach homonymy. International Journal of Teaching, Learning and Education, 3(5), 65–69.
Munawaroh, H., Hartono, R., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2022). The use of code-switching in EFL classroom instruction and interaction. English Education Journal, 12(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i1.50517
Muñoz-Basols, J., Fuertes Gutiérrez, M., Strawbridge, T., & Acosta Ortega, L. (2023). Interactional patterns in the online language classroom: A quantitative analysis across proficiency levels and lesson types. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2286536
Nguyen, H. L. T., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2024). Coercive conditions and strategic compliance: Vietnamese EFL teacher identity construction and neoliberal values. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2024.2392279
Nguyen, L. Q., & Le, H. V. (2023). Enhancement of EFL learners' lexical retention: The role of social constructivism. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2223811. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2223811
Simel Pranjić, S. (2021). Development of a caring teacher-student relationship in higher education. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.1.151.163
Temesgen, A., & Hailu, E. (2022). Teachers' code switching in EFL classrooms: Functions and motivations. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2124039
Tong, Z., An, F., & Cui, Y. (2024). Exploring teacher discourse patterns: Comparative insights from novice and expert teachers in junior high school EFL contexts. Heliyon, 10(16), e36435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36435
Ulum, Ö. G., & Clark, M. D. (2024). Breaking down linguistic barriers: The radical impact of translanguaging on pre-service EFL teachers' perspectives in Turkey. PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0315982. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315982
Villabona, N., & Cenoz, J. (2022). The integration of content and language in CLIL: A challenge for content-driven and language-driven teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 35(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.
Wang, X., Jiang, R., & Li, J. (2023). Teachers' classroom discourse pattern for postgraduates majoring in foreign linguistics: A perspective of Legitimation Code Theory. World Journal of Educational Research, 10(5), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.22158/wjer.v10n5p26
Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.
Xu, G., Haratyan, F., & Tian, H. (2026). A systematic review of teacher emotion regulation and well-being: Implications for student engagement, learning outcomes, and professional development in EFL contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1715266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1715266
Yule, G. (2020). The study of language (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Novi Indriyani, Dian Agustina Purwanto Wakerkwa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









