HERMENEUTIC PARADIGM IN JAVANESE PLANT METAPHOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70210/amrj.v3i1.117Keywords:
paradigm, hermeneutic, Javanese, plant, metaphorAbstract
A metaphor is a stylistic device used to convey meaning by expressing a concept or idea through a comparison with another, distinct concept or idea. Metaphors implicitly establish a connection between two unrelated elements to provide a deeper understanding of a concept. This article specifically examines hermeneutic paradigms in Javanese plant metaphors by applying Ahimsa-Putra's paradigm theory in cultural studies. The literature review incorporates hermeneutic and metaphorical analyses from various books and journals. The study highlights that Javanese plant metaphors operate based on fundamental principles regarding their function and the way meaning is conveyed. The core principles include the recognition of comparative concepts and the use of figurative language. Metaphors help explain, illustrate, simplify, and reshape perspectives on reality. Their meaning and application vary across different contexts, cultures, and forms of communication, contributing to the clarity and expressiveness of language.
Downloads
References
Ahimsa-Putra, H. S. (2009a). Bahasa, sastra, dan kearifan lokal di Indonesia. Mabasan, 3(1), 30–57.
Ahimsa-Putra, H. S. (2009b). Paradigma Ilmu Sosial-Budaya. Kuliah Umum “Paradigma Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora.” Bandung: Program Studi Linguistik Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Caspi, T. (2018). Towards Psychoanalytic Contribution To Linguistic Metaphor Theory. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 99(5), 1186–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2018.1490476
Demjen, Z. (2011). Motion and conflicted self metaphors in sylvia plath’s ‘smith journal.’ Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.02dem
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.
Elizabeth, M. Z., Ahimsa Putra, H. S., Sholihan, & Arikhah. (2023). Queen-bee phenomenon: Barriers to women’s participation in politics. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2266896.
Hendrokumoro, Wijana, I. D. P., & Ma’shumah, N. K. (2023). Revisiting the binding designation between source and target domains in the creation of Javanese food names metaphors. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 10(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2250114
Hoetmer, R. (2023). Mimesis, Metaphor, and Sports’ Liturgical Constitution: Ricoeurian and Augustinian Contributions. Religions, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14101329
Jensen, K. B., & Neuman, W. R. (2013). Comm Research—Views from Europe| Evolving Paradigms of Communication Research: Editorial Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 7, 9.
Kovecses, Z. (2015). Metaphor and Culture. Where Metaphors Come From, 2, 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.003.0005
Kovesces, Z. (2010). Metafora, Language, and Culture. DELTA: Documentação e Estudos Em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada. ISSN 1678-460X, 26(3), 739–757.
Kurt, R. (2004). Hermeneutik. Utb Fuer Wissenschaft.
Lakoff, G. (1999). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor Revisited. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1401_6
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2020). Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language. In Shaping Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 475–504). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161921-21
McLeish, T. (2020). A meta-metaphor for science: the true and the fictional within the book of nature. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 45(3), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2020.1794386
Muslih, M. (2020). Filsafat ilmu Imre Lakatos dan metodologi pengembangan sains Islam. TASFIYAH; Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 4(1), 46–90.
Neuman, W. R. (2018). The paradox of the paradigm: An important gap in media effects research. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 369–379.
Nurbani, S., & Barlian, Y. A. (2022). Metafora Pada Iklan Layanan Masyarakat Covid-19. Semantik, 11(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.v11i2.p135-148
Ritchie, L. D. (2008). Gateshead revisited: Perceptual simulators and fields of meaning in the analysis of metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701723565
Wijana, I. D. P. (2015a). Metaphor of Colors in Indonesian. Jurnal Humaniora, 27(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v27i1.6397
Wijana, I. D. P. (2015b). Pengantar semantik bahasa Indonesia. Program Studi S2 Linguistik, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Wijana, I. D. P. (2016). The Use of Metaphors In Indonesian Plant Names. In Language Literature & Society (pp. 142–149). Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Wijana, I. D. P. (2018). Metaphors of Animal Names in Indonesian. Deskripsi Bahasa, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22146/db.v1i1.314
Wijana, I. D. P. (2019). The Use of English for Metaphorical Expressions in Indonesian Slang. Education, Sustainability And Society, 2(4), 08–10. https://doi.org/10.26480/ess.04.2019.08.10
Wijana, I. D. P. (2020). Metaphors of Turtle Dove Physical Characteristics in Javanese Community: A Preliminary Study. The Conference of the Global Council for Anthropological Linguistics in Asia, 48–52.
Wisri, W., & Mughni, A. (2016). Paradigma dasar fenomenologis, hermeneutika dan teori kritis. LISAN AL-HAL: Jurnal Pengembangan Pemikiran Dan Kebudayaan, 10(1), 5–20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Arini Hidayah, I Dewa Putu Wijana, Hendrokumoro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
